His Majesty Sultan Haitham reviews economic, investment projects at SEZ in Duqm Ras Al Khaimah Chamber, Greater Miami Chamber of Commerce strengthen trade, investment ties Saudi ranks among world's top countries in trade indicators UAE deploys $272mln fund to bolster critical industries Etihad Rail, AD Ports launch direct Fujairah-Abu Dhabi freight service Sharjah-Oman logistics corridor cargo value jumps 66% to $463mln Saudi Arabia seeks greater private-sector role in industrial growth Oman Islamic banking assets top over $24bln Salama, Ajman Bank establish strategic partnership CBUAE, Mastercard conclude programme to strengthen national capabilities in fraud risk management Qatar Chamber enhances trade relations with Malaysia's Malacca State Saudi business confidence climbs to 56.7 points on industry, services gains Qassim Cement to acquire 100% of A-Mix for $17.3mln Oman, US discuss financial crime cooperation Saudi's HADAF invests $522mln through 26 strategic partnerships to train, employ 16,000 citizens Qatar, North Macedonia sign agreement to strengthen cooperation in labour sector Sharjah draws investment projects worth $2.1bln in 2025 Saudi Arabia records $1.54bln in POS transactions in one week UAE non-oil growth hits fastest pace since December 2024, PMI shows Oman’s non-oil exports rise 11.4% to $9.3bln, re-exports jump 20% UAE participates in second G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors meeting Saudi Arabia and Syria sign 4 pacts to boost cooperation in transport and logistics sectors Geological assets drive mining, manufacturing growth in Fujairah RAK Chamber explores trade, investment opportunities at UAE-Lebanon Business Forum Saudi Arabia agrees to raise Pakistani agricultural and food exports to $3bln UAE investment council launches data tools to boost overseas investment Oman's public revenue rises 13% to $17.2bln in first half of 2026 Saudi Arabia’s construction costs rise 2.3% in July 2026 ADIB provides $37mln Islamic financing for Glasgow logistics hub Oman’s tea and coffee imports hit record highs

Log in

عربي

Media Centre

Home » Media Centre

Kuwait: Heirs not liable for debts if insurance coverage in place

Kuwait: Heirs not liable for debts if insurance coverage in place

Kuwait: Heirs not liable for debts if insurance coverage in place

Dec 11, 2024

KUWAIT CITY: The Court of Cassation confirmed in a ruling issued by the Commercial Circuit that financial institutions, including banks, cannot hold heirs responsible for paying off the debts of a deceased person as long as all loan contracts signed with the individual before their death included life insurance. In its ruling, the court stated that the insurance companies with which the banks had signed loan insurance agreements are responsible for repaying the loans in case of the person’s death or inability to work.

The case in question involved a civil commercial lawsuit filed by the first contested bank against the appellant and other parties, demanding a joint obligation to pay KD 6,878,559, along with the agreed compensation for the delay, set at 10 percent annually from the date the account was closed until full payment was made. In a statement, the bank stated that under a banking facilities contract, the heirs of the appellants and respondents had obtained a loan of KD 7,000 with an interest rate of 10 percent per annum, to be repaid in monthly installments.

The borrower continued to make payments until his death. Upon his death, all outstanding installments, amounting to KD 7,000, along with the interest due until the account closure date, became due. The loan had been insured with an insurance company to cover its value in the event of disability or death. As such, the insurance company was obligated to pay the remaining loan balance and the due interest, but the insurance company refused.

The heirs of the borrower were required to pay the loan jointly with the insurance company, within the limits of what they received from the deceased’s estate. As a result, the bank filed the lawsuit. The court ruled that the lawsuit had lapsed due to the statute of limitations regarding the second respondent and rejected the case concerning the remaining parties.